I know that I can post quite a bit about politics. It is just so irritating to have conservative commentators who are either “christian” or say they want freedom of religion (and, thus, play the religious card for their own gain) and yet act in such a contrary way to moral ethics (simply to prove their point). I harp on the conservatives because it is this group that will always take the higher moral ground in any conversation about doing what is right and good.
Just today I heard Jim Quinn from Quinn and Rose play a clip from President Obama’s speech at the U.N. In this clip the only thing that got played was the part where our President said, “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” Quinn (and I am sure others) went off saying things like, “Can you believe that OUR president would say that?” The implication is, and has been since Obama came in office, is that he is a secret Muslim intent on reforming and reshaping America into either a communist or muslim nation (the jury is still out on which narrative gets more air play). Quinn played this clip twice and the second time stopped it too early and said, “Sorry I stopped the clip to early, let me play it again.” Why the concern for stopping the clip too early?
Well, here is the context of what President Obama said:
The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt – it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted “Muslims, Christians, we are one.” The future must not belong to those who bully women – it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons. The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s resources – it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs; workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the men and women that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support.
Now the reason is more clear. He said that after condemning those who target Coptic Christians. Those who bully women. Those who steal resources only to make themselves richer. Then he said what he did about those who slander the prophet of Islam. But then, right on the heels of that came the remark that those Muslims who are furious with those slanders cannot then turn around and desecrate images of Jesus, or destroy churches, or deny the holocaust.
We must always take into account the full account and not bits and pieces (sound bites) that people want us to bite on for their own agenda’s. One may still not like Obama as our President, one may not like what he said about not slandering the prophet of Islam. But certainly there was plenty in that speech to commend and approve.